reattested

Build provenance, signed artefacts, reference values

Attested software supply chain

The strongest TEE will faithfully verify the wrong build.

Runtime attestation compares what is running with what should be running. 'Should' comes from your build: provenance, signatures and reference values. If that chain is weak, the strongest TEE verifies the wrong thing.

Who this is for

When trust has to be proved again

Every releaseProduce reference values and provenance together, so verifiers can trust the new build at once.
A dependency or base image changesMeasurements change even when your code does not.
A signing key is rotated or compromisedEverything signed with it needs a decision: keep, re-sign or revoke.

What we deliver

Questions worth answering

Across the life cycle

DesignBuildMake or deployOperateUpdateRetire

The stage that decides here: build. This area is the build stage. Its output is what every later stage is compared against. See attestation in the product life cycle.

Rules and standards your buyers cite

Cyber Resilience ActNIS2

Industries that use this

Blockchains and decentralised networks

Go deeper

Who builds in this area

From our public landscape: SLSA, in-toto, Sigstore, GUAC, Witness, Chainguard, TestifySec, Kusari, GitHub Artifact Attestations.

Not quite your case? The runtime side? Attested cloud workloads. Model lineage? AI passport.

Working on Attested software supply chain? A first call takes 30 minutes and commits you to nothing. Bring your product and the one question that worries you.

Next fixed date: EU Digital Identity Wallets are due in every member state on 24 December 2026, 42 days from now.