reattested

Drug development, laboratories, clinical trials, manufacturing

Pharma and life sciences

A result is only as good as the proof of what produced it.

Drug development runs on data integrity. Regulators expect every result to be attributable, original and accurate. That expectation now reaches instruments, lab automation, AI models and cloud pipelines that change every month. Validation is done once, at qualification. The software keeps moving.

Who this is for

Where the problem shows

An instrument or lab robot gets a software updateIt was qualified with the old version. Its next result needs to be tied to what actually ran.
An in vivo or imaging system records study dataThe record is evidence for an approval. Its origin and the software that captured it should be provable years later.
Partners train a model on each other's compoundsNeither side wants to reveal its library. Both need proof that only the agreed training code saw the data.
A manufacturing line changes a recipe or controllerBatch records should show the controller's state, from the controller.
An inspector asks how a result was producedThe answer should include the software and model versions, with evidence.

What we deliver

Questions worth answering

Across the life cycle

DesignBuildMake or deployOperateUpdateRetire

The stage that decides here: design. Validation happens at design and qualification. The gap is everything afterwards, while the validated system keeps changing. See attestation in the product life cycle.

Rules your buyers cite

GxP data integrity rulesGDPREU AI ActCyber Resilience Act

Our work in this industry

Attested AIAI passportAttested OT and industrial controlAttested devices

Go deeper

Working on pharma and life sciences? A first call takes 30 minutes and commits you to nothing. Bring your product and the one question that worries you.

Next fixed date: EU Digital Identity Wallets are due in every member state on 24 December 2026, 42 days from now.